Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Thomas Gruja, Plaintiff-Libellant-Appellant v. United States Lines Company, Defendant-Respondent-Appellee

337 F.2d 375

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-10-08
Topic
employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-libellant-appellant (libellant) was a boatswain aboard the SS Pioneer Minx, a freighter owned by the defendant, United States Lines. Michael Koliada was the licensed Chief Engineer of the Minx. Libellant alleged that Koliada, while intoxicated, severely assaulted him while both men were aboard the Minx in Hong Kong Harbor on January 29, 1959, and that the alleged assault by a fellow employee rendered the defendant shipowner liable in negligence and for breach of an implied warranty that the Minx was seaworthy. From the judgment and *376 final decree dismissing the libel and complaint, libellant appeals.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thomas Gruja, Plaintiff-Libellant-Appellant v. United States Lines Company, Defendant-Respondent-Appellee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
GRUJA v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY,337 F.2d 375(2nd Cir. 1964)
Thomas GRUJA, Plaintiff-Libellant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES LINES
COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12, Docket 28239.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Submitted September 23, 1964.
Decided October 8, 1964.
Kenneth Heller, New York City (Donald S. Sherwood, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-libellant-appellant.

Kirlin, Campbell Keating, New York City (James B. Magnor and Alexander P. Gillen, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-respondent-appellee.
Before MOORE, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff-libellant-appellant (libellant) was a boatswain aboard the SS Pioneer Minx, a freighter owned by the defendant, United States Lines. Michael Koliada was the licensed Chief Engineer of the Minx. Libellant alleged that Koliada, while intoxicated, severely assaulted him while both men were aboard the Minx in Hong Kong Harbor on January 29, 1959, and that the alleged assault by a fellow employee rendered the defendant shipowner liable in negligence and for breach of an implied warranty that the Minx was seaworthy. From the judgment andPage 376final decree dismissing the libel and complaint, libellant appeals.

Findings of fact of a court of admiralty sitting without a jury may not be set aside on appeal unless "clearly erroneous." Fed.R.Civ.P. 52; McAllister v. United States,348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20 (1948). Here it appears that the District Court's assessment of credibility and resultant findings of fact, on which the final decree was based, were not clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52, McAllister v. United States, supra, since there is substantial evidence in the record to support these findings. Furthermore, an appellate court should not lightly substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.

A discussion of libellant's claims as to negligence and breach of seaworthiness warranty is unnecessary in view of the District Court's finding that libellant did not prove that the alleged assault actually took place or that he sustained any injuries therefrom.

Judgment affirmed.