Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Suisman v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.

83 F.2d 1019

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-05-04
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Judgment (15 F.Supp. 113) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Suisman v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

SUISMAN v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY,83 F.2d 1019(2nd Cir. 1936)

Sarah P. SUISMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST

COMPANY, as Executor of the ESTATE of Robert O. EATON, Formerly Collector

of Internal Revenue for the District of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 358.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 4, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.

Henry M. Gretsch, of New York City, for appellant.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, and Paul R. Russell, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Robert P. Butler, U.S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (15 F. Supp. 113) affirmed.