Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co.

Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co., 325 F.2d 238 (2d Cir. 1963)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1963-12-12
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • aff'd per curiam on the basis of Lang

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stephan v. Marlin Firearms Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
STEPHAN v. MARLIN FIREARMS COMPANY,325 F.2d 238(2nd Cir. 1963)
Frances Metzger Wirth STEPHAN, Guardian of the Estate of Charles Wirth,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The MARLIN FIREARMS COMPANY, Inc., et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 218, Docket 28376.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued December 12, 1963.
Decided December 12, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; William H. Timbers, Judge.

Defendant Marlin Firearms Company, Inc., by permission granted under28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), appeals from the denial of its motion to dismiss the action for lack of diversity jurisdiction in the court below.
Kevin T. Gormley, New Haven, Conn. (Martin E. Gormley and Gormley Gormley, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendants-appellants.

Theodore I. Koskoff, Bridgeport, Conn. (James M. Desmond, Norwalk, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, SMITH, and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction affirmed in open court. See Lang v. Elm City Construction Co., D.C.Conn.,217 F. Supp. 873, affirmed 2 Cir.,324 F.2d 235; the opinion of Judge Timbers below herein, D.C.Conn.,217 F. Supp. 880; and Cole v. Jerman,77 Conn. 374,59 A. 425.Page 239