Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Remington Arms Co. v. United States

Remington Arms Co. v. United States, 461 F.2d 1268 (2d Cir. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-07-18
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM: We affirm the order and judgment of the District Court upon the well reasoned opinion of Arthur H. Latimer, United States Magistrate (D.Conn.1971), as approved and adopted by the District Court, Robert C. Zampano, District Judge.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Remington Arms Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES,461 F.2d 1268(2nd Cir. 1972)
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 722, Docket 71-2188.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 28, 1972.
Decided July 18, 1972.
Gary R. Allen, Atty., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Stewart H. Jones, U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Richard C. Pugh, New York City (Ronald A. Partnoy, Bridgeport, Conn., Roger W. Thomas, Stephen L. Cohen, and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the District Court for the District of Connecticut.
Before MOORE, SMITH and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm the order and judgment of the District Court upon the well reasoned opinion of Arthur H. Latimer, United States Magistrate (D.Conn. 1971), as approved and adopted by the District Court, Robert C. Zampano, District Judge.Page 1