Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Rady v. Netherlands American Steam Navigation Co.

Rady v. Neth. Am. Steam Navigation Co., 28 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1928)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1928-10-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Decree affirmed. See Gooch v. Oregon Short Line R. R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rady v. Netherlands American Steam Navigation Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
RADY v. NETHERLANDS AM. STEAM NAVIGATION CO.,28 F.2d 1017(2nd Cir. 1928)
G. Hannon RADY, as Guardian ad Litem of Henry Rady, Infant,
Libelant-Appellant, v. NETHERLANDS AMERICAN STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, also
Known as the Holland American Line, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 38.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 29, 1928.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Frederic H. Cowden, of New York City, for appellant.

Burlingham, Veeder, Masten Fearey, of New York City (Morton L. Fearey and R.H. Caldwell, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed. See Gooch v. Oregon Short Line R.R. Co.,258 U.S. 22, 42 S. Ct. 192, 66 L. Ed. 443; Cudahy Packing Co. v. Munson S.S. Line (C.C.A.)22 F.2d 898; W.R. Grace Co. v. Panama R.R. Co. (C.C.A.)12 F.2d 338.

Decree affirmed, with costs.Page 1018