Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Malm v. United States Lines Co.

Malm v. United States Lines Co., 378 F.2d 941 (2d Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-06-05
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • aff’d on the basis of the district court’s opinion

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Malm v. United States Lines Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
MALM v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY,378 F.2d 941(2nd Cir. 1967)
Elof MALM, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 489, Docket 31199.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 5, 1967.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., sitting with a jury, finding appellant negligent, and from Judge Weinfeld's opinion denying appellant's motion to set aside the verdict and direct a verdict for appellant, or order a new trial.
Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E.P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott Auslander, New York City, for appellee.
Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion in the District Court, reported at269 F. Supp. 731(S.D.N.Y. 1967).1Page 942
  1. Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld's opinion. ↩