Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Lepine

In re Lepine, 70 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1934-04-30
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Orders (4 F. Supp. 808) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Lepine. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

IN THE MATTER OF LEPINE,70 F.2d 1017(2nd Cir. 1934)

In the Matter of Treffle LEPINE, Bankrupt-Appellee, David B. Lefkowitz,

Tishman Realty Construction Co., and Minnie Lepine, Appellants.

No. 395.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 30, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Nordlinger, Riegelman Cooper, of New York City (H.H. Nordlinger and Jacob M. Dinkes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Licht Licht, of New York City (Benjamin H. Licht and Arthur Averbuck, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.Page 1018

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Orders (4 F. Supp. 808) affirmed.