Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Lake Tankers Corp.

235 F.2d 783

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1956-08-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Petition for rehearing en banc of our decision; 2 Cir., 232 F.2d 573, affirming as modified the decision, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 187 F.Supp. 311, granted. Upbn due and further consideration by the entire court of the appeal on the merits and of the able additional briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we adhere to our original decision, Judges CLARK, FRANK, LUMBARD„ and WATERMAN, concurring. Judges MEDINA and HINCKS dissenting.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Lake Tankers Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
6 opinions
MATTER OF LAKE TANKERS CORPORATION,235 F.2d 783(2nd Cir. 1956)
Matter of the Petition of LAKE TANKERS CORPORATION for Exoneration from or
Limitation of Liability.
No. 268, Docket 23965.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Petition Filed June 7, 1956.
Decided August 21, 1956.
On Petition for Rehearing en banc.
Burlingham, Hupper Kennedy, New York City (Eugene Underwood and H. Barton Williams, New York City, ofPage 784counsel), for Lake Tankers Corporation, petitioner-appellant.

Rosen Rosen, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., and Mahar Mason, New York City (Frank C. Mason, New York City, of counsel), for Lillian M. Henn, claimant-appellee, in opposition.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK, MEDINA, HINCKS, LUMBARD, and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petition for rehearingen bancof our decision, 2 Cir.,232 F.2d 573, affirming as modified the decision, D.C.S.D.N.Y.,137 F. Supp. 311, granted. Upon due and further consideration by the entire court of the appeal on the merits and of the able additional briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we adhere to our original decision.

Judges CLARK, FRANK, LUMBARD, and WATERMAN, concurring.

Judges MEDINA and HINCKS dissenting.Page 785