Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Faour

78 F.2d 1015

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1935-07-01
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Order (11 F. Supp. 462) affirmed on the authority of In re Realty Associates Securities Corp. (C. C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Faour. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MATTER OF FAOUR,78 F.2d 1015(2nd Cir. 1935)

In the Matter of Dominick J. FAOUR and George J. Faour, Individually and

as Copartners, Doing Business as D.J. Faour Bros. and D.J. Faour

Bros., Private Bankers, Debtors Appellees. David Haar and Howard Bloom,

Appellants, Irving Trust Company, Receiver, Appellee.

No. 487.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 1, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

David Haar, of New York City, for appellants.

Oppenheimer, Haiblum Kupfer, of New York City, for receiver.

Max E. Sanders and Allen Memhard, both of New York City, for debtors.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order (11 F. Supp. 462) affirmed on the authority of In re Realty Associates Securities Corp. (C.C.A.)69 F.2d 41.