Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Cichanowicz

In re Cichanowicz, 353 F.2d 538 (2d Cir. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-11-10
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. We affirm in open court the order of the district court, which adopted and confirmed the action of the bankruptcy referee in voiding as a preferential transfer a mortgage executed by the bankrupt to the petitioner-appellant, for the rea-, sons stated by Judge Bartels in his opinion dated May 11, 1965, reported at 247 F.Supp. 975.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Cichanowicz. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
MATTER OF CICHANOWICZ,353 F.2d 538(2nd Cir. 1965)
In the Matter of Joseph CICHANOWICZ, Bankrupt.
No. 159, Docket 29892.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued November 10, 1965.
Decided November 10, 1965.
Appeal from an order of the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of New York, John R. Bartels, Judge, confirming an order of the bankruptcy referee.
Michael F. Friedman, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Albert Sacklow, Mineola, N.Y., and Leonard Schwartz, Brooklyn, N Y, for trustee-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in open court the order of the district court, which adopted and confirmed the action of the bankruptcy referee in voiding as a preferential transfer a mortgage executed by the bankrupt to the petitioner-appellant, for the reasons stated by Judge Bartels in his opinion dated May 11, 1965, reported at247 F. Supp. 975.