Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Hooker v. Hoey
107 F.2d 1016
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1939-11-20
- Topic
- litigation
107 F.2d 1016 (1939) George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hooker v. Hoey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
107 F.2d 1016 (1939)
George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
No. 71.
George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 20, 1939.Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant.
John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, D. C., 27 F.Supp. 489.