Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Groban v. American Casualty Co.

456 F.2d 685

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-04-07
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The decision of the district court, 331 F.Supp. 883, is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Groban v. American Casualty Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

GROBAN v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY,456 F.2d 685(2nd Cir. 1972)

SIDNEY J. GROBAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SAUL GROBAN,

ET AL., APPELLEES, v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

No. 560, Docket 71-1928.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 20, 1972.

Decided April 7, 1972.

William K. Johnson, Chicago, Ill. (Lord, Bissell Brook, Chicago, Ill., Joseph T. McGowan, Hill, Rivkins, Warburton, McGowan Carey, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Joseph J. Magrath, 3rd, New York City (Alexander Peltz, Bigham, Englar, Jones, Houston, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Frederick vanPelt Bryan, Judge.

Before HAYS, MANSFIELD and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The decision of the district court, 331 F.Supp. 883, is affirmed.Page 687