Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Ganduxe y Marino v. Esperdy

278 F.2d 330

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-04-13
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We affirm in open court on the opinion of Judge Dimock. 183 F.Supp. 565.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ganduxe y Marino v. Esperdy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 2 opinions

MARINO v. ESPERDY,278 F.2d 330(2nd Cir. 1960)

Enrique Esteban GANDUXE y MARINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.A. ESPERDY,

District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the

New York District, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 258, Docket 25658.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued April 13, 1960.

Decided April 13, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward J. Dimock, Judge.

Morton Silfen, New York City (Brandon Silfen, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Charles J. Hartenstine, Jr., Spec. Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court on the opinion of Judge Dimock.183 F. Supp. 565.