Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Duncan v. Commissioner

47 F.2d 1082

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1931-03-02
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Decision affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Duncan v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

DUNCAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,47 F.2d 1082(2nd Cir. 1931)

Charles E. DUNCAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 106.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 2, 1931.

Appeal from a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Oscar E. Waer, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for petitioner.Page 1083

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Cutler Thompson and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., both of Washington, D.C. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Stanley Suydam, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.