Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Dorothy M. Fordyce v. Round Hill Developments, Ltd., D/B/A Round Hill Hotel of Montego Bay, Jamaica
585 F.2d 30
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-10-13
- Topic
- real-estate
PER CURIAM: In this diversity personal injury case we must decide whether the defendant, a hotel situated in Jamaica, has subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the New York courts. Plaintiff’s only substantial claim in this regard is that defendant’s contract with Raymond & Whitcomb Co., an independent travel agent, is a sufficient contact to confer jurisdiction. Examination of the pertinent documents disclose that Raymond and Whitcomb is in no real sense defendant’s agent but rather an independent contractor, engaged — at its own risk and expense — in leasing hotel rooms from defendant in order to complete its own annual Thanksgiving tour to Jamaica. Our decision in Gelfand. v. Tanner Motor Courts, Ltd.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dorothy M. Fordyce v. Round Hill Developments, Ltd., D/B/A Round Hill Hotel of Montego Bay, Jamaica. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Mary Ann D'Amato, New York City (Mendes Mount, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
[2] Plaintiff's only substantial claim in this regard is that defendant's contract with Raymond Whitcomb Co., an independent travel agent, is a sufficient contract to confer jurisdiction. Examination of the pertinent documents disclose that Raymond and Whitcomb is in no real sense defendant's agent but rather an independent contractor, engaged — at its own risk and expense — in leasing hotel rooms from defendant in order to complete its own annual Thanksgiving tour to Jamaica.
[3] Our decision inGelfand v. Tanner Motor Courts, Ltd.(2d Cir. 1967)385 F.2d 116is inapposite. There the New York based travel organization was truly an agent for its out of state principal, binding it to honor individual reservations, and retaining only a commission out of the monies collected on its behalf.
[4] We therefore affirm the District Court's dismissal of the complaint for substantially the reasons set forth in Judge Haight's opinion below.Page 31
- Of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. ↩