Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Bowles v. Rothman

145 F.2d 831

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1944-12-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Cudmore v. Bowles, App.D.C., 145 F.2d 697.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bowles v. Rothman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
BOWLES v. ROTHMAN,145 F.2d 831(2nd Cir. 1944)
Chester BOWLES, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Appellee,
v. Harry ROTHMAN, Appellant.
No. 171.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 21, 1944.
On appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, directing the defendant, Rothman, to appear before an "enforcement attorney" of the Office of War Price Administration, and to produce the documents, books and records, relating to his business as a jobber in cotton, rayon and like textiles.
Nathan B. Fogelson, of New York City, and Cohen Wedeen, for appellant.

A.M. Dreyer, of Brooklyn, for appellee.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Cudmore v. Bowles, App.D.C.,145 F.2d 697.