Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Biever Motor Car Co. v. Chrysler Corp.

Biever Motor Car Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 199 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1952)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1952-12-01
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 675.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Biever Motor Car Co. v. Chrysler Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BIEVER MOTOR CAR COMPANY v. CHRYSLER CORP.,199 F.2d 758(2nd Cir. 1952)

BIEVER MOTOR CAR COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 102, Docket 22491.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued November 13, 1952.

Decided December 1, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Carroll C. Hincks, Judge.

From a summary judgment for the defendant in an action by The Biever Motor Car Company against the Chrysler Corporation for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals.

Herbert L. Emanuelson, New Haven, Conn. (James G. Austin, Hornell, N.Y., Richard J. Bookhout and Sterling P. Harrington, Oneonton, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Cummings Lockwood, Stamford, Conn., Raymond E. Hackett, Stamford, Conn., William H. Timbers, New YorkPage 759City, and George F. Lowman, Stamford, Conn. (Francis S. Bensel, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 2 Cir.,116 F.2d 675.