Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

430 F.2d 1177

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1968-11-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We affirmed in open court1 the decision of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, reported at 314 F. Supp. 235 (D.Conn.1968). . On November 21, 1968.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
7 opinions
BABCOCK WILCOX CO. v. COMBUSTION ENG'G,430 F.2d 1177(2nd Cir. 1968)
The BABCOCK WILCOX COMPANY, Assignee of the Interference Parties
Rothemund and Koch, Appellee, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Assignee of
the Interference Parties Powell, Schroedter, Clayton and Knust, Appellant.
No. 263, Docket 32974.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued November 21, 1968.
Decided November 21, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Robert C. Zampano, Judge.
Arthur S. Tenser, New York City (Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue Raymond, New York City, Ralph G. Elliot, Alcorn, Bakewell Smith, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.

Roland T. Bryan, Stamford, Conn. (Haynes N. Johnson, Robertson, Bryan, Parmelee Johnson, Stamford, Conn., Joseph M. Maguire, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.Page 1178
Before KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.fn*
PER CURIAM:
We affirmed in open court1the decision of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, reported at314 F. Supp. 235(D.Conn. 1968).
  1. Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. ↩
  2. On November 21, 1968. ↩