Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Alexander v. Irving Trust Co.

Alexander v. Irving Tr. Co., 228 F.2d 221 (2d Cir. 1955)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1955-12-20
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Judge Bicks’ reasoned and complete opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 132 F.Supp. 364, demonstrates that there really is no basis for the plaintiff’s claim of plagiarism and unfair competition. We are content to affirm upon that opinion. The judgment below is affirmed, and the defendants are awarded the sum of $300 as counsel fees upon this appeal.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alexander v. Irving Trust Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
11 opinions
ALEXANDER v. IRVING TRUST COMPANY,228 F.2d 221(2nd Cir. 1955)
Rose ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRVING TRUST COMPANY, as Executor
under the Last Will and Testament of Clarence P. Oberndorf, Deceased, and
Columbia University Press, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 167, Docket 23789.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued December 15, 1955.
Decided December 20, 1955.
Writ of Certiorari Denied March 26, 1956.
See 76 S.Ct. 545.
Page 222
Richard J. Mackey, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Abberley, Kooiman Amon, New York City, for defendant-appellee Irving Trust Co.

Satterlee, Warfield Stephens, New York City (David Asch, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Columbia University Press.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judge Bicks' reasoned and complete opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y.,132 F. Supp. 364, demonstrates that there really is no basis for the plaintiff's claim of plagiarism and unfair competition. We are content to affirm upon that opinion.

The judgment below is affirmed, and the defendants are awarded the sum of $300 as counsel fees upon this appeal.