Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Erickson Campbell
981 F.3d 1014
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2020-12-02
- Topic
- bankruptcy
USCA11 Case: 16-10128 Date Filed: 12/02/2020 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-10128 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00046-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERICKSON MEKO CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard USCA11 Case: 16-10128 Date Filed: 12/02/2020 Page: 2 of 2 en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Erickson Campbell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
USCA11 Case: 16-10128 Date Filed: 12/02/2020 Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10128
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00046-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERICKSON MEKO CAMPBELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN,
ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA,
and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard
USCA11 Case: 16-10128 Date Filed: 12/02/2020 Page: 2 of 2
en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not
disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED
that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.