Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Troedel v. Dugger

828 F.2d 670

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1987-09-04
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in its Order Granting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of September 23,1986. 667 F.Supp. 1456.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Troedel v. Dugger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

TROEDEL v. DUGGER,828 F.2d 670(11th Cir. 1987)

DAVID W. TROEDEL, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RICHARD DUGGER,

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

CROSS-APPELLEE.

No. 86-5860.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

September 4, 1987.

Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Miami, Fla., Peggy A. Quince, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tampa, Fla., for respondent-appellant, cross-appellee.

Capital Collateral Representative, Mark Evan Olive, Tallahassee, Fla., Steven H. Malone, Sp. Appointed Asst. Representative,Page 671Office of Capital Collateral Representative, W. Palm Beach, Fla., for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before FAY, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in its Order Granting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of September 23, 1986.667 F. Supp. 1456.