Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

14 F.3d 583

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1994-02-22
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

decided after incident in question, but citing relevant prior authority

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 34 opinions

POST v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,14 F.3d 583(11th Cir. 1994)

SANDRA POST, ABILIO LIRIO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,

DEFENDANT, DOUG DANZIGER, CITY COMMISSIONER, JOHN SCHLEGEL, BORIS

SELLERS-SAMPSON, ROY HURLEY, WILLIAM HELMS, WILLIAM BANKS, SR.,

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, PATRICK ROBERTS, PHIL KRAUSS, DEFENDANTS.

No. 92-4661.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 22, 1994.

Robert H. Schwartz, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for defendants-appellants.

Louis C. Thomas, Herzfeld and Rubin, Miami, FL, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 89-6810-Civ-JAG), Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Before EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and HILL, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

[1] We hereby modify our earlier opinion (7 F.3d 1552) by deleting on page 1557 the third full paragraph that begins "Qualified immunity is. . . ." and by deleting on page 1557 the fourth full paragraph that begins "The objective nature. . . ."

[2] The judgment of the court and the remainder of the opinion are unchanged.Page 1507