Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Juan Carlos Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Juan Carlos Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 21 F.4th 775 (11th Cir. 2021)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2021-12-28
Topic: bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

holding that “pursuant to the plain language of Title III of the ADA, public accommodations are limited to actual, physical places,” and thus that “websites are not a place of public accommodation”
holding website not place of public accommodation, but later vacated as moot

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Juan Carlos Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 15 opinions

USCA11 Case: 17-13467      Date Filed: 12/28/2021   Page: 1 of 2




                                                     [PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                       No. 17-13467-CC
                   ____________________

JUAN CARLOS GIL,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC.,


                                           Defendant-Appellant.


                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Southern District of Florida
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 17-13467         Date Filed: 12/28/2021     Page: 2 of 2




2                                                            17-13467

BEFORE: JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, Circuit Judges, and REEVES,∗
District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
       The Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by Appellee Juan
Carlos Gil is GRANTED. Due to the expiration of the injunction
while the appeal was pending and the absence of any formal award
of declaratory relief, the appeal was rendered moot. “A moot case
is nonjusticiable and Article III courts lack jurisdiction to entertain
it.” Troiano v. Supervisor of Elections in Palm Beach Cnty., Fla.,

382 F.3d 1276, 1281

 (11th Cir. 2004).
      Accordingly, we vacate our opinion and the underlying
judgment, dismiss the appeal, and remand for the district court to
dismiss the case as moot.




∗Honorable Danny C. Reeves, United States District Chief Judge for the
Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.