Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Jean v. Nelson

714 F.2d 96

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1983-08-16
Topic: general

BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *97The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jean v. Nelson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

JEAN v. NELSON,714 F.2d 96(11th Cir. 1983)

MARIE LUCIE JEAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, LUCIEN LOUIS, ET AL.,

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, CROSS-APPELLANTS, STATE OF FLORIDA,

INTERVENOR-APPELLANT, v. ALAN C. NELSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,

CROSS-APPELLEES.

No. 82-5772.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

August 16, 1983.

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Sonia O'Donnell, Leon B. Kellner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., Robert L. Bombaugh, William French Smith, Atty. Gen., Rudolph W. Giuliani, Associate Atty. Gen., Barbara L. Herwig, Michael Jay Singer, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Kurzban Kurzban, Miami, Fla., Ira J. Kurzban, Mary Gilmore and Terrence A. Corrigan, New York City, Michael J. Rosen, Miami, Fla., F/HAITIAN REFUGEE CENTER; Vera Weisz, Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., Miami, Fla., Bruce J. Winick, ACLU Foundation of Fla., Inc., Irwin P. Stotzky, Univ. of Miami, School of Law, Coral Gables, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.

J. Kendrick Tucker, Deputy Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for intervenor-appellant.

Christopher Keith Hall, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion April 12, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983,711 F.2d 1455).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[3] A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en bancwithoral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.Page 97The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.