Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Carl Ray Songer v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., and Richard L. Dugger, Etc.
755 F.2d 1395
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-02-01
- Topic
- bankruptcy
BY THE COURT: On January 29, 1985 this Court denied a motion to recall the mandate pending en banc consideration of Hitchcock v. Wainwright, No. 83-3578. A petition for rehearing has been filed. Since further proceedings are pending before other courts, on the basis of a record which is not before this panel, the order denying recall of the mandate is amended by deleting therefrom the following sentence: All of Songer’s claims have been fully litigated and decided. The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carl Ray Songer v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., and Richard L. Dugger, Etc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
SONGER v. WAINWRIGHT,755 F.2d 1395(11th Cir. 1985)
CARL RAY SONGER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, ETC., AND
RICHARD L. DUGGER, ETC., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES.
No. 83-3500.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
February 1, 1985.
Frank Lester Adams, III, Peggy A. Ouince, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, Fla., for respondents-appellees.
Before RONEY and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and SIMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[2] A petition for rehearing has been filed.
[3] Since further proceedings are pending before other courts, on the basis of a record which is not before this panel, the order denying recall of the mandate is amended by deleting therefrom the following sentence:
All of Songer's claims have been fully litigated and decided.
[4] The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.Page 1396