Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Bankwest, Inc. v. Baker
Bankwest, Inc. v. Baker, 433 F.3d 1344 (11th Cir. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2005-12-28
- Topic
- general
*1345BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bankwest, Inc. v. Baker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
BANKWEST, INC. v. BAKER,433 F.3d 1344(11th Cir. 2005)
BANKWEST, INC., Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Georgia, Inc.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, Community State Bank, First American Cash Advance
of Georgia, LLC, Cash America Financial Services, Inc., Georgia Cash
America, Inc., First Bank of Delaware, Creditcorp of Georgia, LLC, County
Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, Express Check Advance of Georgia, LLC,
Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thurbert E. BAKER, Attorney General
of the State of Georgia, Cathy Cox, Secretary of State, for the State of
Georgia, in their official capacities, Defendants-Consolidated
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-12420.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
December 28, 2005.
Thurbert E. Baker, Isaac Byrd, Sidney Ray Barrett, Jr., Atlanta, GA, for Appellees.
James T. McIntyre, Jr., Chrys D. Lemon, McIntyre Law Firm, PLLC, Deborah M. Zuckerman, AARP Foundation Lit., Linda A. Arnsbarger, Morrison Foerster, LLP, Washington, DC, Erin Glenn Busby, Bracewell Patterson, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Michael D. Calhoun, Center for Responsible Lending, Durham, NC, for Amici Curiae.
(Opinion June 10, 2005,411 F.3d 1289, 11th Cir. 2005)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.fn*Page 1345
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
- Senior United States Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩