Opinion · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Sonnabend v. Commissioner

Sonnabend v. Comm’r, 267 F.2d 319 (1st Cir. 1959)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1959-05-21
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. These petitions for review were argued jointly with the petitions in Goodstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Goodstein, 1 Cir., 267 F.2d 127, and presented substantially the same questions. Consequently the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the basis of our opinion in the Goodstein cases decided today.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sonnabend v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
34 opinions
SONNABEND v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,267 F.2d 319(1st Cir. 1959)
Abraham M. SONNABEND et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v.
Abraham M. SONNABEND et al., Respondents.
Nos. 5448, 5449.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
May 21, 1959.
On petitions for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
John P. Allison, New York City, with whom Stanley W. Herzfeld and Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Allison Tucker, New York City, on brief, for Abraham M. Sonnabend et al.Page 320

Grant W. Wiprud, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Harry Baum, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These petitions for review were argued jointly with the petitions in Goodstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Goodstein, 1 Cir.,267 F.2d 127, and presented substantially the same questions. Consequently the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the basis of our opinion in the Goodstein cases decided today.Page 382