Opinion · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Gilman v. Kestral Corp.

181 F.2d 188

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1950-04-26
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. An examination of the record and briefs discloses no occasion to add to or comment upon the opinion of the court below reported in D.C., 86 F.Supp. 765. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gilman v. Kestral Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
GILMAN v. KESTRAL CORPORATION,181 F.2d 188(1st Cir. 1950)
Martin John GILMAN, Appellant, v. KESTRAL CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 4470.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
April 26, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; George C. Sweeney, Judge.
Maxwell James, New York City (Robert L. Thompson, Boston, Mass., on brief), for appellant.

Hector M. Holmes, Boston, Mass., (Robert P. Harvey, Springfield, Mass., on brief), for appellee.
Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and MARIS and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
An examination of the record and briefs discloses no occasion to add to or comment upon the opinion of the court below reported in D.C.,86 F. Supp. 765.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.Page 189
Page 311