Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
United States v. James
United States v. James, 71 M.J. 3 (C.A.A.F. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2011-12-07
- Topic
- litigation
CCA 20081163. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. James. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
CCA 20081163. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]