Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
United States v. Bigback
United States v. Bigback, 71 M.J. 8 (C.A.A.F. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2011-12-20
- Topic
- general
CCA 20101044. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS *9REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Bigback. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CCA 20101044. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS*9 REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.