Opinion · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Ex parte Shoemaker

Ex parte Shoemaker, No. AV92000788, UP7683890 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama Aug. 5, 1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Date
1994-08-05
Topic
general

On Remand from the Supreme Court THIGPEN, Judge. The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of May 13, 1994, 644 So.2d 961 (Ala.1994), the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied. WRIT DENIED ON REMAND. ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex parte Shoemaker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions

On Remand from the Supreme Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of May 13, 1994, 644 So.2d 961 (Ala.1994), the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.

WRIT DENIED ON REMAND.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.