Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama

Owensby v. State

Owensby v. State, 82 Ala. 63 (Ala. 1886)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Date
1886-12-15
Topic
general

CLOPTON, J. — It is competent for the defendant to show by any legal evidence, that another committed the offense with which he is charged, and that he is free from participation in its commission; but it is well settled, that this can not be shown by the admissions or confessions of a third person, not under oath, such being mere hearsay. Wes v. State, 76 Ala. 98; Snow v. State, 58 Ala. 372. It is also said, that hearsay is not confined, in the legal sense, to what is said; that acts or conduct, as well as words, may be hearsay. — 1 Whar. on Ev. § 173.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Owensby v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
15 opinions
CLOPTON, J.

— It is competent for the defendant to show by any legal evidence, that another committed the offense with which he is charged, and that he is free from participation in its commission; but it is well settled, that this can not be shown by the admissions or confessions of a third person, not under oath, such being mere hearsay. Wes v. State, 76 Ala. 98; Snow v. State, 58 Ala. 372. It is also said, that hearsay is not confined, in the legal sense, to what is said; that acts or conduct, as well as words, may be hearsay. — 1 Whar. on Ev. § 173. Plight on being accused of crime, excitement, and the exhibition of similar emotions, may be regarded in the nature of admissions, because arising from a consciousness of guilt; but, as they may naturally be produced, in some persons, by causes other than a sense of guilt, they are considered of the least probative force of all competent testimony; certainly not equal to a voluntary and deliberate declaration or confession. They are circumstances too uncertain and illusory to be reliable or admissible to prove the innocence of the accused, by showing the guilt of a third person. They are within the *65 reason and policy of the rule, which excludes the admissions or confessions of such other person . — Smith v. State, 9 Ala. 990.

The Circuit Court did not err in excluding the evidence of the excited appearance and flight of Moreman.

Affirmed.