Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Mack

375 So. 2d 504

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Date
1979-08-24
Topic
general

We granted certiorari to review petitioner's judgment of conviction, which fixes his punishment at death. After studying the record, briefs, and listening to the oral arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 375 So.2d 476 affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court is correct and it is hereby affirmed. AFFIRMED. TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur. BEATTY, J., with whom JONES, J., joins, concurs in part and dissents in part.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex Parte Mack. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
18 opinions
EX PARTE MACK,375 So.2d 504(Ala. 1979)
375 So.2d 504
Ex parte Willie Lewis MACK.
(In re Willie Lewis Mack v. State of Alabama.)
78-383.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
August 24, 1979.
Rehearing Denied September 28, 1979.
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
J.L. Chestnut, Jr. of Chestnut, Sanders Sanders, Selma, for petitioner.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and James F. Hampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, respondent.
ALMON, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review petitioner's judgment of conviction, which fixes his punishment at death.

After studying the record, briefs, and listening to the oral arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals,375 So.2d 476affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court is correct and it is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

BEATTY, J., with whom JONES, J., joins, concurs in part and dissents in part.
BEATTY, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I would affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals,375 So.2d 476on all issues except that dealing with the trial court's findings on aggravating circumstances. On that issue I believe that the views of Bookout, J., are correct.

JONES, J., concurs.