Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama
Crim v. Gilbert
267 Ala. 665
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Alabama
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama
- Date
- 1958-07-24
- Topic
- general
COLEMAN, Justice. There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Crim v. Gilbert. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^753(2).
Affirmed.
LAWSON, SIMPSON, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.