Opinion · Washington Supreme Court Opinions

IN RE JAMES BYRON HOLCOMB, 167 Wn.2d 1008 (2009)

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against JAMES BYRONHOLCOMB, an Att’y at Law., 167 Wash. 2d 1008 (Wash. 2009)

Type
Opinion
Court
Washington Supreme Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Washington
Date
2009-11-17
Topic
general

IN RE JAMES BYRON HOLCOMB, 167 Wn.2d 1008 (2009) In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JAMES BYRONHOLCOMB, an Attorney at Law. No. 1695.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 17, 2009. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] By an order dated November 17, 2009, the Supreme Court, in accordance with ELC 9.1(c)(2) and 13.9, suspended the above named attorney from the practice of law for three years, effective June 21, 2008.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE JAMES BYRON HOLCOMB, 167 Wn.2d 1008 (2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN RE JAMES BYRON HOLCOMB,167 Wn.2d 1008(2009)
In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JAMES BYRON
HOLCOMB, an Attorney at Law.
No. 1695.
The Supreme Court of Washington.
November 17, 2009.
By an order dated November 17, 2009, the Supreme Court, in accordance with ELC 9.1(c)(2) and 13.9, suspended the above named attorney from the practice of law for three years, effective June 21, 2008.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩