Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
STATE v. ULTICAN, 36 Wn. App. 1071 (1984)
STATE OF Wash., Respondent, v. THOMAS ULTICAN, JR., Appellant.THE STATE OF Wash., Respondent, v. DANIEL M. PIERRE, Appellant., 36 Wash. App. 1071 (Wash. Ct. App. 1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1984-02-21
- Topic
- general
STATE v. ULTICAN, 36 Wn. App. 1071 (1984) THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. THOMAS ULTICAN, JR., Appellant.THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL M.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ULTICAN, 36 Wn. App. 1071 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. ULTICAN,36 Wn. App. 1071(1984)
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,Respondent,v. THOMAS ULTICAN, JR.,Appellant.
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,Respondent,v. DANIEL M. PIERRE,Appellant.
Nos. 11890-1-I; 11891-9-I.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
February 21, 1984.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 82-1-00291-3, 82-1-00292-1, Peter K. Steere, J., entered June 22, 1982.
Affirmedby unpublished opinion per Swanson, J., concurred in by Williams and Callow, JJ.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩