Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court

Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl

92 Wis. 62

Type
Opinion
Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Wisconsin
Date
1896-01-07
Topic
litigation

Winslow, J. No interest should have been allowed except from the time of the commencement of the action. There had been no demand for payment, and the statements of account sent by the plaintiff at regular intervals, and kept by the defendant, in which no interest was ever claimed, constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, in the absence of fraud and mistake. Cobb v. Arundell, 26 Wis. 553; Chandler v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
Winslow, J.

No interest should have been allowed except from the time of the commencement of the action. There had been no demand for payment, and the statements of account sent by the plaintiff at regular intervals, and kept by the defendant, in which no interest was ever claimed, constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, in the absence of fraud and mistake. Cobb v. Arundell, 26 Wis. 553; Chandler v. People's S. Bank, 61 Cal. 401.

By the Gourt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.