Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
State v. Lindholm
164 Wash. 2d 1029
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2008-11-05
- Topic
- general
196 P.3d 139 (2008) STATE of Washington, Petitioner, v. Chris Anthony LINDHOLM, Respondent. No. 80130-4. Supreme Court of Washington. November 5, 2008.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Lindholm. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Chris Anthony LINDHOLM, Respondent.
No. 80130-4.
Supreme Court of Washington.
November 5, 2008.ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, at its November 5, 2008, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of State v. Magers, 164 Wash.2d 174, 189 P.3d 126.
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief Justice