Opinion · Supreme Court of Virginia

Pease v. Commonwealth

Pease v. Commonwealth, 266 Va. 397 (Va. 2003)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Virginia
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Date: 2003-10-31
Topic: general

PER CURIAM We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the trial court did not err in (1) failing to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds, (2) failing to disqualify the special prosecutor and to dis*398miss and quash the indictment, and (3) failing to set aside the jury verdict because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law. We have considered the questions, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 39 Va. App. 342, 573 S.E.2d 272 (2002), we will affirm its judgment. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pease v. Commonwealth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

PER CURIAM

We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the trial court did not err in (1) failing to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds, (2) failing to disqualify the special prosecutor and to dis *398 miss and quash the indictment, and (3) failing to set aside the jury verdict because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law.

We have considered the questions, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 39 Va. App. 342, 573 S.E.2d 272 (2002), we will affirm its judgment.

Affirmed.