Opinion · Supreme Court of Virginia
Daughtery v. Commonwealth
217 Va. 353
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- Jurisdiction
- Virginia
- Date
- 1976-10-08
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. This appeal, like Hodge v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 338, 228 S.E.2d 692, (this day decided), challenges the defendant’s second degree murder conviction under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as explicated in Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), and In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970). The challenged instruction here, Instruction D, was the equivalent of Instruction 17 in Hodge.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Daughtery v. Commonwealth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
EARL DAUGHTERY, ALSO KNOWN AS EARL DAUGHTRY
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.
Record No. 760057.
Supreme Court of Virginia.
October 8, 1976.Present, All the Justices.
Under authority of companion case instruction sustained.
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Hon. Robert F. McMurran, judge presiding.
J. Wayne Sprinkle (John S. Joannou, on brief), for plaintiff in error.
Jim L. Chin, Assistant Attorney General (Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General, on brief), for defendant in error.
Per Curiam.
This appeal, like Hodge Commonwealth, 217 Va. 338, 228 S.E.2d 692, (this day decided), challenges the defendant's second degree murder conviction under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as explicated in Mullaney Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), and In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970). The challenged instruction here, Instruction D, was the equivalent of Instruction 17 in Hodge.
Since the law of Virginia and this instruction only required the defendant to produce some evidence contesting the presumed malice, and the ultimate burden of persuasion beyond a reasonable doubt remained with the Commonwealth, we find this claim to be without merit for the reasons set forth in Hodge.
Affirmed.