Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pitsch v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission

517 U.S. 1172

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-04-29
Topic
estate-planning

How later courts describe this case

  • “[a]t a minimum, ... the petitioner during direct appeal must have explicitly referred the state courts to the United States Constitution or federal case law”
  • “At minimum, though, the petitioner during direct appeal must have explicitly referred the state courts to the United States Constitution or federal case law.”
  • ‘Were protestation of innocence the only prerequisite to application of this exception, we fear that actual innocence would become a gateway forever open to habeas petitioners’ defaulted claims.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pitsch v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
32 opinions

Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.