Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Krug v. Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.
Krug v. Valley Fid. Bank & Tr. Co., 510 U.S. 1042 (1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-01-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- discussing a removal petition which "merely states, without any elaboration, that `the matter in controversy cx-ceeds $50,000..." 13 . Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co., 63 F.3d 1326, 1335 (5th Cir.1995
- discussing a removal petition which “merely states, without any elaboration, that ‘the matter in controversy exceeds $50,000 . . . .’”
- "If defendants wish to avoid the procedure of removing a case and then having it remanded after the plaintiff comes forward with an affidavit specifying his damages, there are other avenues available for clarifying an indeterminate complaint”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krug v. Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 43 opinions
Krug
v.
Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. et al.
No. 93-606.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 540.