Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McMahon v. Green
474 U.S. 819
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-10-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming trial court’s refusal to provide interpreter during voir dire to a defendant who had resided in the United States for seven years
- canine sniff conducted at the door of a person’s dwelling was search requiring warrant based on probable cause
- “Probable cause to believe certain items will be found in a specific location is a ‘practical, nontechnical conception,’ [citations omitted] that need not be based on direct, first-hand, or ‘hard’ evidence.”
- consent decree approved by federal district court may not be collaterally attacked in state court on underlying state law issue
- dog sniff conducted outside door of apartment found to be a search
- use of drug dog to sniff at door of defendant’s apartment
- dog sniff outside apartment door constituted a search requiring a warrant
- dog sniff outside apartment door requires probable cause
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McMahon v. Green. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 167 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.