Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners

Geisinger v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 435 U.S. 905 (1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-02-27
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "the giving of multiple `Allen' charges is to be avoided and may constitute reversible error..."
  • “the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally”
  • jury instructed that "[i]t is important that a decision ... be reached here, and I really see no good reasons why a decision cannot be reached"
  • harmless error analysis applies when trial judge answers jury's note without defendant or his counsel being present
  • second deadlock instruction upheld after an 11-1 split for conviction, known to the trial court, continued and a signed note by the holdout juror delivered to the court
  • introduction of gun to establish bank robbery defendant’s identity and opportunity, held permissible
  • affirming decision to give second modified Allen charge
  • two ABA instructions not reversible error

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
137 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.