Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ratner v. United States

356 U.S. 368

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1958-05-05
Topic: litigation

Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ratner v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

RATNERv. UNITED STATES,356 U.S. 368(1958)

RATNERv. UNITED STATES ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

ILLINOIS.

No. 819.

Decided May 5, 1958.

162 F. Supp. 518, affirmed.

David AxelrodandJames L. Givanfor appellant.Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney GeneralHansen, Charles H. WestonandRobert W. Ginnanefor the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, andWalter Harwoodfor the Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.Page 369