Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gary S. Et Ux., Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Andrew S. v. Manchester School District

543 U.S. 988

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2004-11-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that a judge’s general interest as a resident, taxpayer, and property owner does not require recusal in cases where the local sheriffs department was a party
  • “To state an equal protection claim, [plaintiff] must allege that ‘through state action, similarly situated persons have been treated disparately’ ... and put forth evidence that [defendant’s] actions were motivated by race”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gary S. Et Ux., Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Andrew S. v. Manchester School District. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
22 opinions

543 U.S. 988

GARY S. ET UX., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR SON, ANDREW S.
v.
MANCHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 04-418.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 15, 2004.

1

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 374 F. 3d 15.