Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Stansbury v. Graber

Stansbury v. Graber, 193 F.2d 42 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-12-06
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We find no error in the record. Therefore, the decision of the District Court is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stansbury v. Graber. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

STANSBURY v. GRABER,193 F.2d 42(D.C. Cir. 1951)

Ruth H. STANSBURY, Appellant v. Grace B. GRABER, Appellee.

No. 10919.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

December 6, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Walter M. Evans, Richmond, Va., for appellant.

John J. O'Brien, Washington, D.C., with whom Henry J. Siegman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before CLARK, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the record. Therefore, the decision of the District Court is

Affirmed.Page 43

Page 230