Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Town of Genoa v. Woodruff

92 U.S. 502

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1876-03-27
Topic
general

*503 Mr. Justice Strong delivered the opinion of the court. Twenty-six errors have been assigned in this case, not one of which can be sustained. All which have the least plausibility have been considered and declared unfounded in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, supra, p. 494; and the others might well be dismissed without special notice.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Town of Genoa v. Woodruff. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions
*503 Mr. Justice Strong

delivered the opinion of the court.

Twenty-six errors have been assigned in this case, not one of which can be sustained. All which have the least plausibility have been considered and declared unfounded in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, supra, p. 494; and the others might well be dismissed without special notice. The thirteenth complains that the circuit judge decided that the plaintiffs could recover interest upon the coupons from the time they fell due. That the ruling was correct is perfectly plain. It was in entire accordance with the decisions generally of the State courts and also of this court.

The other assignments have either been answered in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, or they are totally without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Miller, Mr. Justice Davis, and Mr. Justice Field, dissented.