Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Brooks v. American General Financial Services, Inc.

Brooks v. Am. Gen. Fin. Servs., Inc., 127 S. Ct. 369 (2006)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2006-10-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors simply because she did not discuss each one individually!.]”
  • “Reasonableness review does not entail the substitution of our judgment for that of the sentencing judge. Rather, the standard is akin to review for abuse of discretion.”
  • “In calibrating our review for reasonableness, we will continue to seek guidance from the considered judgment of the Sentencing Commission as expressed in the Sentencing Guidelines and authorized by Congress.”
  • “[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors simply because she did not discuss each one individually or did not expressly parse or address every argument relating to those factors that the defendant advanced.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brooks v. American General Financial Services, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
58 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.