Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Crestmark Bank v. United States
Crestmark Bank v. United States, 549 U.S. 810 (2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2006-10-02
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- finding that the petitioner failed to exercise the requisite diligence in bringing to federal court the facts he claimed show that he is innocent
- “[t]he purpose of corporate successor liability ... is to prevent corporations from evading their liabilities through changes in ownership”
- The REAL ID Act also provides, " ‘[n]othing in subparagraph (B) or (C), or in any other provision of this chapter (other than this section
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Crestmark Bank v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 39 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.